Page 13 - POPS - Action Plan
P. 13

ACTiON PLAN / 269




        Strategic direction 2. improve the network of trails to, within, and between public spaces to increase
        access and enhance connectivity.
               Responsible Parties  Potential Partners  Potential funding Sources  Time frame    Cost Range Est.
        2.2.5.   Explore creative and efficient ways to educate users about trail etiquette.
               DPR, DES          BAC, PAC, trail/recreation   Operating budget    continuous     $
                                 advocacy groups, Washington
                                 Area Bicyclist Association,
                                 BikeArlington, WalkArlington

        2.2.6.   Continue to develop “learn to ride” areas that provide protected spaces for novice users to learn to bicycle.
               DPR               DES                    Capital budget            continuous     $$



        2.2.7.   Expand trail use monitoring to track usage across all major trails by mode, and use gathered data to help guide the trail planning
               process.
               DES, DPR          NOVA Parks, NPS        Operating budget          continuous     $$


        Action 2.3. Provide or make better connections to hiking trails.

               Responsible Parties  Potential Partners  Potential funding Sources  Time frame   Cost Range Est.
        2.3.1.   Weigh the benefits of adding hiking trails to protected natural areas against the impacts to natural resources.
               DPR               NPS, Adjacent property   Operating budget, capital budget,   long term   $$
                                 owners                 federal funding           (10–20 years)

        2.3.2.   Improve the quality of and increase access to Four Mile Run and Potomac tributary trails.
               DPR, DES          NOVA Parks, NPS        Operating budget, capital budget  continuous  $$$



        2.3.3.   Show connections to hiking trails in neighboring jurisdictions on signage and in communication materials.
               DPR, DES          Neighboring jurisdictions  Operating budget, capital budget  short term  $
                                                                                  (0–5 years)


        Action 2.4. Develop and implement a consistent signage and wayfinding system.

               Responsible Parties  Potential Partners  Potential funding Sources  Time frame    Cost Range Est.
        2.4.1.   Name all trail segments using descriptive names.
               DPR, DES          BAC, PAC               Operating budget          short term (0–5   $
                                                                                  years)

        2.4.2.   Work with trail owners within Arlington and neighboring jurisdictions to develop common trail signage and wayfinding standards for
               major regional trails.
               DES, DPR          Neighboring jurisdictions,   Operating budget    medium term    $$
                                 NOVA Parks, BAC, PAC                             (5–10 years)

        2.4.3.   Develop a County design standard for trail signage and wayfinding that addresses hierarchy, connections, destinations, landmarks,
               identity, and areas of congestion.
               DES, DPR          BAC, PAC               Operating budget          medium term    $$
                                                                                  (5–10 years)









                                                                                                   FINAL DRAFT
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18